17 YEARS FIGHTING TIRELESSLY FOR VICTORY FOR CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS

MAIN OFFICE - SILVER SPRING, MD: JON KATZ, P.C., 8720 Georgia Avenue, Suite 703, Silver Spring, Montgomery County, MD 20910, 

(301) 495-7755/FAX (301) 585-7733, jon[at]katzjustice[dot]com

VIRGINIA BRANCH OFFICE: Jon Katz, P.C., 1420 Spring Hill Road, Suite 600, Tysons Corner/ McLean, Fairfax County, Virginia 22102, (703) 917-6626.

HIGHLY-RATED LAWYER, ONE MILE FROM THE NATION'S CAPITAL

JON KATZ IS HIGHLY-RATED THROUGH PEER REVIEWS AND AVVO.COM CLIENT RATINGS, AND

IS REPEATEDLY CONSULTED BY THE NEWS MEDIA:

- SUPER LAWYERS-LISTED

- 10.0 AVVO RATING

Practicing Criminal Defense and Drunk Driving/ DUI/ DWI throughout Maryland, Washington, D.C., and Virginia, including the state and federal courts in Montgomery County (Rockville and Silver Spring), Fairfax County, Northern Virginia, Arlington County, Alexandria, Prince George's County (Upper Marlboro, Hyattsville, Greenbelt, and Andrews Air Force Base), Howard County (Ellicott City), Frederick County, Anne Arundel County (Annapolis, Glen Burnie, Ft. Meade), Baltimore City, Baltimore County (Towson, Catonsville, Essex), Washington County (Hagerstown), Prince William County (Manassas), and Loudoun County (Leesburg). 

See more client testimonials here and AVVO.com reviews here.

By Jon Katz

NOTE:  This article is adapted from a message Jon Katz posted to several lawyers' e-mail listserves, to advance qualified representation to immigrants in criminal proceedings.    

    This message is prompted by the many times I see judges, probation authorities, and civil lawyers improperly ask parties their immigration status; lawyers not sufficiently addressing/finessing the question; and lawyers not sufficiently advising their non-citizen clients about the negative immigration implications from convictions.

    Hardly a week passes when our law firm's not tackling an issue about the immigration implications of a potential or imposed conviction for our clients who are not United States citizens. Here are a few critical points to consider when representing non-citizens for criminal matters:

- Don't assume your client is a U.S. citizen, even if s/he speaks like Walter Cronkite. Ask.

- Your non-citizen client will not always know his or her immigration status, in part because immigration laws and procedures are so voluminous and complex.

- Questions about immigration risks from convictions can only sufficiently be answered by going to the primary source, including the immigration statutes, regulations, court opinions, and administrative appeals opinions. You're behind the eight ball if you or your advisory counsel don't learn and go to the primary source to answer your questions on this topic.

- Not all convictions will harm immigration status. However, the law is so complex in this area that any conviction at all might lead to delay and detention of a non-citizen upon re-entry to the United States or upon any other encounter with immigration authorities, until the immigration authorities, immigration court, or federal court sorts out the situation.

- The analysis of immigration risks from convictions ordinarily starts (but does not always end) with the two-part question of whether a conviction will amount to a crime of moral turpitude or an aggravated felony; either one poses negative immigration implications even if the other is absent.

o "Crime of moral turpitude" remains insufficiently defined. Some crimes fit squarely within the definition (e.g., theft, rape, robbery and murder). However, plenty of crimes fall in a gray area, which might only be resolved by future immigration litigation.

o Crime of moral turpitude problems are meant to affect those who did not lawfully enter the United States at least five years beforehand. However, that does not avoid immigration risks if the crime is also an aggravated felony.

o The aggravated felony analysis depends on the category of crime. For a drug conviction, for instance, the crime is an aggravated felony if the sum of the executed and unexecuted sentence amounts to a year or more.

o For the aggravated felony analysis, immigration law is not concerned with whether the criminal law classifies a crime as a misdemeanor.

o Other convictions can also raise immigration risks (e.g., repeated convictions for alcohol use crimes).

- Beware counterintuitive results. Simple possession of controlled dangerous substance paraphernalia can make a non-citizen deportable, whereas possession of thirty grams or less of marijuana might have less onerous consequences on lawful permanent residents, and on other non-citizens who can show that their United States-citizen spouse, parent or child would suffer extreme hardship from denial of admission to the United States. Therefore, think twice before accepting a prosecutor's offer to plead guilty to possessing a pot pipe in exchange for dropping an accusation of possessing thirty grams or less of marijuana.

- The effect of the conviction might depend on whether the issue involves deportation, exclusion, or adjustment of immigration status, as well as the non-citizen's current immigration status.

- At a deportation proceeding, sometimes defenses (including hardship of deportation to family members who remain in the United States) can successfully be raised to avoid deportation from convictions. Some convictions permit few or no defenses to deportation. Legions of immigrants have been deported for age-old theft convictions, for instance.

- A probation before judgment (in Maryland) and a suspended imposition of sentence (in Virginia) will likely be considered convictions for immigration purposes.

- Will judges once and for all stop asking criminal defendants their immigration status? During the in-court guilty plea qualification, all that needs to be asked is: "Do you understand that if you are not a United States citizen, a conviction for this case might cause you immigration problems, including deportation, exclusion, and problems for adjustment of immigration status?"

- When a judge asks a criminal defendants' immigration status, the criminal defense lawyer must protect the confidentiality of this information. Sometimes it's as easy as saying: "Judge, since immigration status is protected by federal law, I think we can accomplish the same goal by my confirming that I have advised this client and all my clients that if they are not a United States citizen, a conviction for this case might cause them immigration problems, including deportation, exclusion, and problems for adjustment of immigration status." It helps also to be able to tell the judge that you constantly deal with immigration implications of convictions, and that you know the possible immigration implications of the instant criminal proceeding.

- Will police, parole and probation officers, and court personnel once and for all stop asking people their immigration status? Until that day, it becomes all the more important for us to prepare and join our clients at their probation intake meetings. Maryland probation officers now hand the probationer a form saying that it is REQUIRED to provide one's immigration status; that flies in the face of the continuing federal law protection of people's immigration status. When a client of mine recently refused to provide the information when I told him -- as pre-planned -- in front of the probation officer that he had no obligation to provide the information, the officer asked me to write down that he refused to provide the information; instead, I wrote down that counsel told him he didn't have to provide the information.

- Non-citizens who are in the United States without a visa or other legal authority need all the more to have a qualified attorney with them any time they deal with criminal justice system authorities.

- Immigration status might become a beneficial part of guilty plea negotiations, to seek a plea that will minimize negative immigration consequences. For instance, if your client is charged with assault, consider seeking an amendment of the charge to disorderly conduct. If your client is charged with felony burglary, consider seeking an amendment to simple breaking and entering (and in Maryland make sure the record makes clear the plea is to subsection (a) of the statute, because some of the other provisions involve a deportable theft intent provision). If your client is found guilty of marijuana possession, do all you can to have all docket entries, sentence pronouncements, commitment orders, and probation orders show that less than 30 grams of marijuana was involved.

- Discussing your client's immigration status with a prosecutor can be a double-edged sword if the prosecutor is inclined to report your client to immigration or probation authorities. Get a feel for the inclinations of the particular prosecutor and prosecutor's office in this regard; public defender lawyers are a good place to start.

- When in doubt, call a qualified lawyer with immigration expertise.

It is not enough to minimize immigration risks in criminal court. We must overhaul the immigration laws to make them more humane for immigrants. We must sensitize judges, police, and everybody else to the confidentiality of immigration status information. We must overcome overt and subtle anti-immigrant biases of judges, juries and everyone else, which mushroomed all the more with the fears that too often supplanted reason following the September 11 murders.

NOTE: This article appeared in the November/December 2003 newsletter of the Maryland Criminal Defense Attorneys Association. Jonathan L. Katz is the Criminal and Constitutional Defense partner at Silver Spring's JON KATZ, P.C.. Jon practices extensively in Maryland, the District of Columbia, and Virginia, handling state and federal trials, appeals, post conviction, and habeas corpus. Jon is Chair of the Immigration Law Committee of the Maryland Criminal Defense Attorneys Association. More of Jon's articles are at www.katzjustice.com/articles.htm. Copyright JON KATZ, P.C., 2003; all rights reserved.

lawyer best attorney DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Fairfax County, Fairfax City, Rockville, Montgomery County, Prince George's County, Hyattsville, Upper Marlboro, Howard County, Ellicott City, Annapolis, Glen Burnie, Anne Arundel County,  Baltimore, Frederick County, Arlington County, Alexandria City, Prince William County, Manassas, Leesburg, federal court, Loudoun County 703 301 240 443 434 410 540 571 757 804 202 drunk driving drunken driving DWI, DUI, OWI, OUI, driving while intoxicated, driving while impaired, 

Who is the best criminal lawyer lawyers attorney attorneys who's 

Fighting for criminal defendants and the Constitution is a calling that Jon Katz relishes. Jon does it not as the most lucrative way to earn a lawyer's living, but because he believes strongly in this path and loves the work and the interaction with his clients.  

Our clients are what we are all about. Therefore, we work tirelessly to deliver them the best service we can, using all our experience, skill, caring, and resources to help our clients win. We do our best to help our clients go on with their lives as we work on their behalf. We welcome our clients' ideas, inquiries and teamwork. We work with our clients as a united front against our opponents, and are happy for our opponents to know that we are prepared for battle and fearless to go to battle. We know that honey catches more flies than sandpaper, but also know that nothing beats being fully armed to battle for justice for our clients.

8720 Georgia Avenue, Suite 703

Silver Spring, Montgomery County, Maryland 20910

(301) 495-7755/FAX (301) 585-7733

jon[at]katzjustice[dot]com

1420 Spring Hill Road, Suite 600, Tysons Corner/ McLean, Fairfax County, Virginia 22102, (703) 917-6626.

Jon Katz started this website in 1999 when with Marks & Katz. He continues this website with his law firm Jon Katz, P.C., which opened in July 2008. 

Visit our homepage at www.katzjustice.com. Copyright by Jon Katz, P.C.