Of Crawford, drugs, guns, and certificates of no record

Mar 13, 2009 Of Crawford, drugs, guns, and certificates of no record

On March 12, 2009, the Washington, D.C., Court of Appeals reversed a drug felony conviction, after reaffirming that drug chemist reports are testimonial hearsay under Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004). Millard v; U.S., ___ A.2d __ (D.C., March 12, 2009). The appellate court also reversed Millard’s conviction for possessing a handgun, having found a real risk that the jury may have found guilt for the handgun based on the potential relationship between the gun and inadmissible — yet admitted — drugs.

In any event, the appellate court joined the growing line of courts that find certificates of no record (“CNR”) — offered into evidence here to show the handgun was not registered  — to be non-testmonial even when the custodian of the records does not testify. With the already-argued Melendez case, we shall see in this Supreme Court term the Court’s further interpretation of Crawford.

ADDENDUM: Thanks to my colleague Steve Levin for forwarding Millard to me. Because of the slower frequency of D.C.-issued appellate criminal law opinions than in neighboring Maryland, I sometimes only check D.C. opinions every other day, but I certainly check them prior to any trial in D.C.

Practicing peace in the face of war
In Maryland, judges may not order sex offender registration if law does not mandate registration
No Comments

Post A Comment