Some of this week’s critical appellate opinions
In addition to my April 17 review of the Supreme Court’s Baze lethal injection case, here is a brief overview of some additional critical criminal appellate decisions from this week:
– In Burgess v. U.S., ___ U.S. ___ (April 16, 2008), writing for a unanimous court, Justice Ginsburg affirmatively answered the following question presented: "The question in this case is whether a state drug offense classified as a misdemeanor, but punishable by more than one year’s imprisonment, is a ‘felony drug offense’ as that term isused in §841(b)(1)(A)."
– In Begay v. U.S. ___ U.S. ___ (April 16, 2008), the United States Supreme Court ruled that "New Mexico’s crime of “driving under the influence” falls outside the scope of the Armed Career Criminal Act’s clause (ii) ‘violent felony’ definition."
– In Maryland v. Baby, ___ Md. ___ (April 16, 2008), Maryland’s highest court determined that "post-penetration withdrawal of consent negates initial consent for the purposes of sexual offense crimes and, when coupled with the other elements, may constitute the crime of rape. We also hold, however, that the trial court erred in failing to sufficiently address the jury’s questions on post-penetration withdrawal of consent, and such error was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt." Jon Katz.