Home » Blog » Criminal Defense » Unanimous Supreme Court allows reasonable articulable suspicion for entry into a woman’s home

Unanimous Supreme Court allows reasonable articulable suspicion for entry into a woman’s home

Call Us: 703-383-1100

Since when does reasonable articulable suspicion allow warrantless entry into one’s home? Apparently when the cop runs in after the owner runs in after being asked about weapons therein. Ryburn v. Huff, ___ U.S. ___ (2012).

CALL FOR A FREE IN-PERSON MEETING about your court-pending Virginia criminal or DUI case

Posted in Criminal Defense

He has a long record of success - and I am happy I made that choice.
Jon was able to negotiate a settlement with the prosecutor that was initially a plea to a lesser charge; then a dismissal of that charge, without admission of guilt, and without conviction . He also negotiated several thousand dollars in fines, down to only paying a one hundred dollar court cost. This result was quite a lot more than I had thought possible. Jon had settled a case that potentially would lead to serious jail sentence – down to essentially no serious penalty at all. This is what Jon did:
1. Over multiple weekly phone conversations, he interviewed me about all relevant factors of the case.
2. He aggressively sought and obtained – thru “discovery”, and “Brady” — multiple bodycams from arresting officers. He spent about 12 hours reviewing these videos carefully. He used the term “inside the four square corners”. This was a term that reflects a careful search for precisely what was used by police to obtain consent to search, and all aspects of the arrest – and if the provided video evidence supported or challenged – the eventual charges. He carefully looked for any details from the scene, or from dialogue, that were exculpatory.
3. He assigned me multiple tasks, beginning on day one – that forced me to focus on the charges, weigh my culpability, and make strong behavioral changes that may possibly indicate to prosecution that I recognize the problems I have created, and am taking direct actions to counter the damage I have done- and obviate future injury or harm. This was additionally helpful because it provided me with a sense of some control over my situation.
4. He spoke to me on numerous occasions, by phone, to give a detailed plan for my defense. He informed me in a firm but also supportive way – seeking my consent – and he was realistic – but also allowed some hope and dignity for the position I was in.
5. He did an extensive literature and case review to find any prior cases that could act as precedent in my case. He was able to find a recent, high profile case, that was settled in a Virginia Court. Its main elements were similar to mine. Jon obtained the transcript of the cross-examination in that case. When Jon had reviewed those elements, he was then able to hire an expert witness who could address the discovered vulnerabilities.
6. Jon showed an extensive knowledge of case law. He also showed expertise in the plea negotiation process.
7. The day of trial, Jon was able to show the prosecutor, and the judge, that he was prepared to offer a methodically laid out defense, with recent precedent, and expert testimony. Also, he was able to present me in a context a little broader that just a person attached to these charges. He showed this event in a broader sense of my life, and convinced the judge that I had taken steps to correct my problems, and that I had been of service to society for many decades. He presented what I believe to be an accurate and FAIR assessment of my situation.
I can look back over the past several months since I hired Jon. It started as a google search for “Best Virginia Lawyer”. The first search results, at the top of the page- I knew these were paid advertisements. I generally skip these ads, trying to find the most accurate reviews. But – and I am happy I did – I also reminded myself that these ads are PAID FOR and whoever is paying for the ads likely IS SUCCESSFUL , so I gave Jon a shot.
He has a long record of success – and I am happy I made that choice.
Anon.
Source: Avvo
Jon is such a kind man and takes his cases very personally
Jon is an absolute master of his craft with a passion to defend his clients! I was unjustly charged with drunk in public at a national airport for wearing a world cup jersey and “smelling of alcohol.” My airline refused my boarding and called the police and without any questioning, I was arrested perfectly sober.
Jon fought for me in court and took my drunk in public case all the way to trial where he hammered the arresting offer for not offering me any sort of intoxication test and for not displaying any drunk in public attributes. It is unheard of to be found not guilt of a drunk in public, yet Jon knew my innocence and knew I was unjustly arrested.
Jon is such a kind man and takes his cases very personally. No matter how small or large your case, Jon will get you the results you need and I highly recommend him for his unbelievable experience and for being a master of his craft. There is no lawyer like Jon and you can count on him to keep you informed and comfortable throughout the entire process.
Jon is the man and I can’t thank him enough for having my found not guilty under a jury trial and beating the unjust system!
Anon.
Source: Avvo
He is always prepared and has thoughtful arguments for the Court to consider
Jon is one of the most experienced and knowledgeable lawyers in the Area. He is always willing to help and teach younger attorneys the ins and outs of the good practice of law. He is always prepared and has thoughtful arguments for the Court to consider.
Terry Adams
Source: Google

Unanimous Supreme Court allows reasonable articulable suspicion for entry into a woman’s home

Jon Katz Practices in the Following Courts and Beyond