Home » Blog » Criminal Defense » Page 125

Criminal Defense

Call Us: 703-383-1100

Use Brady as a shield and sword

Last August, I wrote about  Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963).  In its key holding, Brady proclaims: “We now hold that the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where the evidence is material either to...

“Swear words” are not sufficient by themselves to get a conviction

Recently, Virginia’s Court of Appeals confirmed that so-called "swear words" are insufficient by themselves to convict for obscene or profane language. In Lofgren v. Virginia, ___ Va. App. ___ (Nov. 3, 2009), the Court reversed Lofgren’s conviction for a phone call in which he let loose...

Jan 2010 Recent Virginia Supreme Court Opinions

Following are some particularly important recent Virginia Supreme Court opinions: Logan v. Virginia, ___ Va. ___ (Jan. 15, 2010): The “exclusionary rule is not applicable in probation revocation proceedings absent a showing of bad faith on the part of the police.” Jones v. Virginia, ___...

Tracking Virginia criminal law legislative proposals

Thanks to a fellow listserv member for posting the following links for tracking criminal law legislation being proposed during the current Virgnia legislative session: Criminal law – substantive:https://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?101+sbj+018 Criminal law -procedure:https://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?101+sbj+019 Juvenile:https://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?101+sbj+099 Circuit Court – procedure:https://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?101+sbj+017 District Courts – procedure:https://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?101+sbj+016

Praised be Steve Rench and his organization approach

A friend told me he once saw Sting on a London street in the mid-1980’s. Word traveled rapidly that he was there, and Sting slipped deftly away before he got mobbed. I, on the other hand, saw Roger Daltrey in a Vancouver hotel lobby in 2001,...

Supreme Court improperly gives short-shrift to trial judge’s essential function in eyeballing witnesses at a suppression hearing

Appellate judges repeatedly refuse to disturb trial judges’ sound discretion in assessing witness credibility in denying a criminal defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. Consequently, appellate judges should also refuse to disturb trial judge’s sound discretion in assessing witness credibility in granting a criminal defendant’s motion to...