Criminal Defense
Did Clarence Darrow distract a jury with a long ash?
Years ago, I heard a story that a lawyer — possibly Clarence Darrow — distracted a jury from the opponent’s argument, impressed that Darrow could create a very long ash with his cigarette or cigar, in the days that smoking was allowed in courtrooms. Recently,...
When immunity trumps the Fifth Amendment
The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides, in part, that no person “shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” However, over thirty-five years ago, the Supreme Court ruled that witnesses can be compelled to give immunized testimony even...
First Amendment Protects the Finger
A survey would likely find infinitely more arrests for finger flipping than finger pulling. However, the First Amendment protects finger flipping, as confirmed earlier this year by the Western District of Pennsylvania: By 2006, numerous federal courts, including a United States District Court in Pennsylvania,...
Abolish the death penatly
Thanks to Barry Scheck for posting about the injustice of the death penalty, which continues to ensnare innocent people, and for referencing a recent in-depth New Yorker article presenting the case that Cameron Todd was innocent of arson, but still executed in 2004 for the...
Do defendants waive confrontation rights by not filing demands for opposing witnesses’ presence?
Virginia and Maryland have statutory provisions requiring defendants, pretrial, to demand the presence at trial of drug chemists and breath technicians, or to waive that right otherwise. Yesterday, Virginia’s Court of Appeals made clear that such a requirement is met when the defense files a...
In Virginia, risky for probationers to refuse to admit their “crimes”
Sentencing judges often are fond of "treatment", without sufficiently considering how beneficial the treatment will be. Too many treatment providers are overly paternalistic, bureaucratic, and barely hesitant to tell on probationers to judges. Who wants to spend years to obtain counseling degrees and licenses only to become tattle-tales to judges?...
Tuning fork documents as inadmissible testimonial hearsay
When the prosecution tries to use documents to prove speeding in its case in chief — for instance in a jailable Virginia reckless driving case — consider responding with the following pre-Melendez cases that limit hearsay evidence to establish such proof: Royals v. Commonwealth, 198...
Hearsay at sentencing hearings
Here are some ideas some colleagues recently suggested for responding in Virginia and beyond to prosecutorial objections about a defendant’s hearsay submissions at sentencing: – Argue that if the presentence report is considered at sentencing, as well as any other hearsay from the prosecution, then...
Prosecutors: It is better to overdisclose than to underdisclose exculpatory evidence
Bill of Rights. (From the public domain.) The newest addition to my blogroll — under the Beyond Blogs category — is Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). I urge all judges, prosecutors, criminal defense lawyers, and police to read Brady at least once a year,...
Why are there lying cops? Because there are lying members of the general population
Too many judges, jurors, and members of the general public accept cops’ words hook, line and sinker, merely because they are cops. Becoming a cop does not cloak a person with superhuman powers not to lie, cheat and steal. Police are drawn from the general...
