Failure to Register as Sex Offender
Fairfax criminal lawyer top-ranked by key attorney reviewers AVVO & Martindale-Hubbell
Virginia criminal lawyer for Fairfax County, Arlington, Prince William, Loudoun & Beyond
Failure to Register as Sex Offender
Failure to file as a sex offender is a jailable offense, underlines Fairfax sex crimes lawyer
Failure to register and re-register as a sex offender is a jailable offense in Virginia, whose statutory law requires such registration for those convicted of murder and such sexual offenses as sexually violent offenses, carnal knowledge with a child of thirteen to fifteen years old, burglary with intent to commit rape, soliciting a minor for prostitution, pimping, child pornography production or trafficking or subsequent possession, and sex trafficking, Va. Code § 18.2-472.1
Sex offender registry prosecutions apply to failure to register and re-register, and to providing false information
As a Fairfax sex crimes lawyer, I know that Virginia law makes failure to register or reregister as a sex offender a crime, as well as to knowingly provide materially false information to the Sex Offender and Crimes Against Minors Registry. Va. Code § 18.2-472.1(A). A first offense is a Class 1 misdemeanor, and a second or subsequent conviction for such an offense is a Class 6 felony. However, if the criminal defendant has been convicted of a sexually violent offense or murder, the penalties get bumped up to a a Class 6 felony for a first offense and a Class 5 felony for a second or subsequent offense. Id.
I know that sexually violent offenses for purposes of Virginia’s failure to register as a sex offender law include abduction with the intent to defile or for prostitution with a child under sixteen, rape, carnal knowledge with a thirteen or fourteen year old (unless the defendant is a minor), forcible sodomy, object sexual penetration, aggravated sexual battery, and indecent liberties with a child under fifteen years old.
Failure to file as a sexually violent offender brings the harshest sentencing exposure
Anthony Wright learned of the harshness of Virginia’s criminal penalties for failure to re-register as a violent sex offender. Wright v. Virginia, Record No. 1238-18-1 (Va. App., Sept. 17, 2019) (unpublished).
Wright was convicted under the previous codification of the felony against carnal knowledge with a minor of the age of thirteen or fourteen years old. He initially followed Virginia’s sex offender registry law, but subsequently changed his residence, and his failure to report the change of residence nor to re-register as a sex offender got him convicted for that.
Pure speculation will not reverse a criminal conviction
Wright’s sole grounds for challenging his conviction for failure to reregister as a sex offender is that perhaps his plea agreement struck the sex offender registration triggering condition for the defendant to be an adult. Here, Wright clearly was an adult at the time of his carnal knowledge offense. Wright underlines that: “This argument is based on pure speculation. Hypotheses of innocence that must be excluded ‘are those which flow from the evidence itself, and not from the imaginations of defense counsel.’ Cook v. Commonwealth, 226 Va. 427, 433 (1983).” Wright.
Fairfax sex crimes lawyer Jonathan L. Katz pursues your best defense against felony misdemeanor prosecutions. To schedule a free in-person consultation with Jon Katz about your pending sex crime prosecution, please call Jon’s staff at 703-383-1100.